<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Sun, 26 May 2013 04:33:50 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Chris Benson Blog</title><subtitle>Chris Benson Blog</subtitle><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/atom.xml"/><updated>2013-04-25T16:07:32Z</updated><generator uri="http://five.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>President Obama's Proposed 2014 Budget</title><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2013/4/25/president-obamas-proposed-2014-budget.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2013/4/25/president-obamas-proposed-2014-budget.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2013-04-25T16:04:31Z</published><updated>2013-04-25T16:04:31Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year <a href="http://lkbenson.squarespace.com/chris/2013/1/3/the-american-taxpayer-relief-act-of-2012.html">The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was passed</a> and it &ldquo;made permanent&rdquo; a number of provisions, including the $5,250,000 (for 2013 and indexed for inflation) estate and gift tax exemption.&nbsp; Apparently they have a loose interpretation of the word &ldquo;permanent&rdquo; down in Washington.&nbsp; President Obama&rsquo;s proposed 2014 budget was released a few weeks ago and it has us going back to the 2009 estate, gift and GST tax rules in 2018.&nbsp; This would increase the top estate tax rate back to 45% from the current 40% and reduce the exclusion amount back to $3.5 million for estate and GST taxes and $1 million for gift taxes.&nbsp;</p>
<p>While the budget will likely face a number of revisions before it reaches its final form and many of these proposals will never become law, it is still important to take a look at them to see what changes we might soon be seeing in the tax law.&nbsp; The estate tax change is just one of many interesting proposals that include:</p>
<ul>
<li>A new      &ldquo;Buffett Rule&rdquo; that would be called the &ldquo;Fair Share Tax&rdquo;.&nbsp; This would make sure that higher income      taxpayers (starting at $1 million of income) pay a minimum tax rate of 30%,      less a credit for charitable contributions.&nbsp; </li>
<li>A      limit on itemized deductions that would cap their value at 28% if your      income is over $250k ($200k for singles).&nbsp;      That means if you are in the highest tax bracket you would no      longer receive a full benefit of your itemized deductions.</li>
<li>This      28% cap on deductions would also apply to tax-exempt bonds, making them      partially taxable for those in the top tax brackets.</li>
<li>A $3      million cap on the value of IRAs and other tax-deferred retirement      accounts.&nbsp; This rule wouldn&rsquo;t      penalize you if your account is over $3 million but would prevent you from      making additional contributions once you reach this limit.</li>
<li>A      number of proposed rules would limit the effectiveness of many estate      planning techniques, such as the use of grantor retained annuity trusts      (GRATs) and intentionally defective grantor trusts (IDGTs).</li>
<li>Elimination      of the &ldquo;stretch IRA&rdquo; where non-spouse beneficiaries are allowed to take      distributions over their life expectancy when they inherit an IRA.&nbsp; Under the new rules the beneficiary      would need to completely withdraw the full amount of the IRA within 5      years of the original owner&rsquo;s death.</li>
</ul>
<p>These are just a few of the more notable highlights from the proposed budget.&nbsp; We will continue to monitor any developments on this front and let you know which, if any, of these proposals actually make it into law.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2013-4-24%20Obama%20Proposed%202014%20Budget.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>The B Word</title><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2013/3/5/the-b-word.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2013/3/5/the-b-word.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2013-03-05T12:49:13Z</published><updated>2013-03-05T12:49:13Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>They are normally the forgotten part of your portfolio.&nbsp; They provide steady returns with low volatility.&nbsp; They aren&rsquo;t as exciting as stocks, but lately they are on everyone&rsquo;s minds.&nbsp; I&rsquo;m talking of course about bonds.&nbsp; Bonds have historically offered lower long-term returns than stocks but provided protection against stock market declines and have been an integral part of any portfolio. &nbsp;However over the past 30 years interest rates have fallen to near zero and seem to have nowhere to go but up in the future.&nbsp; So what does that mean for bonds in your portfolio?</p>
<p>Let&rsquo;s step back a minute to provide a quick summary of how bonds work.&nbsp; When you buy a bond, you are buying a stream of future payments at a certain interest rate.&nbsp; When market interest rates fall, that bond becomes more valuable because nobody else can buy a bond at that rate anymore.&nbsp; When interest rates rise, the bond loses value because now investors can buy a different bond with a higher rate.&nbsp; Rates have been steadily falling for a long time now and as a result, bond investors have not only been earning interest on their bonds, but also gains on the increase in the bonds&rsquo; value.</p>
<p>If you hold individual bonds, you can always hold the bond to maturity, collect the interest payments and receive the principal of the bond at maturity, assuming the entity who issues the bond doesn&rsquo;t default (default risk).&nbsp; Many of our clients use mutual funds to invest in bonds because it is too expensive to buy individual bonds and you need to invest a large amount of money to diversify the bond portfolio enough to reduce the default risk.&nbsp; Bond fund managers don&rsquo;t just hold bonds to maturity &ndash; they actively buy and sell bonds and therefore generate capital gains when bond rates decrease and will generate losses if rates rise.</p>
<p>We know bonds will lose value when rates rise and we know rates are near zero so should we sell all our bond holdings now before rates rise?&nbsp; Of course not!&nbsp; Here is a list of some reasons why you need to keep bonds in your portfolio:</p>
<p class="ListParagraphCxSpFirst">&nbsp;</p>
<ol>
<li>We don&rsquo;t know when rates will rise.&nbsp; The Fed has said it expects to keep short-term rates low through mid-2015, but it&rsquo;s anyone&rsquo;s guess if they will stick to this and if they do, we don&rsquo;t know how intermediate and long-term rates will react.</li>
<li>If you keep expectations in check, bonds will still do their job and provide ongoing income and stability to your portfolio. Don&rsquo;t expect your bond portfolio to earn 6-8% annual returns like we&rsquo;ve seen recently. If you expect more modest returns and keep a long-term focus, you won&rsquo;t be disappointed.&nbsp;</li>
<li>In the long run, higher rates will actually benefit bond investors, assuming inflation stays in check.&nbsp; While the value of your bonds will face a short-term decline in value, new bonds will be issued at higher interest rates.&nbsp; If you are invested in a bond fund or have a bond ladder, money from maturing bonds can be reinvested in bonds with higher yields that will eventually help you recover the short-term loss in value.</li>
<li>Keeping your duration short and your bond portfolio diversified will help protect against a spike in interest rates.&nbsp; Long-term bonds will face a steeper drop in value when rates rise so try to stick to shorter-term bonds, even though that means lower rates right now.&nbsp; Make sure you have some exposure to other bond categories like TIPs, international, high yield and emerging markets.&nbsp; They will behave differently than high quality corporate and municipal bonds and provide some diversification to your portfolio.&nbsp; Just be aware that some of these bond categories are much more volatile.</li>
<li>Remember that even when rates rise and values decline, we aren&rsquo;t likely to see bonds fall 30-40% in value in a short period of time like we saw in the stock market in 2008.&nbsp; A 5-10% loss on your bond portfolio might feel just as bad though, especially when it&rsquo;s been so long since we&rsquo;ve seen bonds lose value at all.&nbsp; But keep things in perspective &ndash; a short-term loss can result in long-term gain.</li>
<li>Bonds are still the best complement to stocks in a portfolio.&nbsp; They have a low historical correlation to stocks so if stocks take another plunge, bonds will help soften that blow.&nbsp; Just look back to 2008 when high quality corporate and government bonds provided positive returns while stocks were in a free fall.&nbsp; We don&rsquo;t know when stocks might see another 2008 so having that protection from bonds is critical.</li>
<li>DIVERSIFICATION!&nbsp; We say this over and over again but we really can&rsquo;t stress it enough.&nbsp; Bonds continue to be the best way to add diversification and reduce volatility in your portfolio. &nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<p>Remember it&rsquo;s important to come up with an asset allocation that makes sense for you given your risk tolerance and return objectives, then sticking to this allocation for the long term.&nbsp; We can&rsquo;t predict what the markets will do in the short-term so having a long-term plan for your money is the best way to accomplish your goals.&nbsp; Now is a great time to review your asset allocation and your bond portfolio to make sure they are in line with your goals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2013-3-4%20The%20B%20Word.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012</title><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2013/1/3/the-american-taxpayer-relief-act-of-2012.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2013/1/3/the-american-taxpayer-relief-act-of-2012.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2013-01-03T15:05:11Z</published><updated>2013-01-03T15:05:11Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>It took until the last minute and it certainly doesn&rsquo;t solve all the problems facing our country, but Congress was finally able to reach a deal to avoid the fiscal cliff.&nbsp; We are still sorting through all the details of the compromise but wanted to highlight a few pieces we thought might have the most impact for many of you:</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Income Taxes:</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Ordinary income tax rates will stay the same if your      income is under $400,000 for single filers or $450,000 for joint      filers.&nbsp; If your income is over      these levels, the top ordinary rates increase from 35% to 39.6%.</li>
<li>The top long-term capital gains and qualified      dividend tax rate rises from 15% to 20%.&nbsp;      This rate applies for those in the new top bracket.&nbsp; For those not in the top bracket, the      prior 0% and 15% rates are made permanent.</li>
<li>The phaseouts for personal exemptions and itemized      deductions are reinstated at income levels of $250,000 (single) and      $300,000 (joint).&nbsp; Itemized      deductions will be reduced by 3% of excess income over the threshold and      personal exemptions will be reduced by 2% of the total exemptions for each      $2,500 of excess income over the threshold.</li>
<li>The AMT is permanently indexed for inflation and the      exemption for 2012 will be $78,750 (joint) or $50,600 (single).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Estate Taxes:</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The $5,120,000 (for 2012) estate and gift tax      exemption is made permanent and indexed for inflation.</li>
<li>The tax rate is raised from 35% to 40%.</li>
<li>Portability for the surviving spouse is made      permanent.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Other Items:</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The 2% payroll tax cut was NOT extended. &nbsp;This was already set to lapse but in      effect will act as a tax increase as the rate had been reduced for the      past 2 years.</li>
<li>The new Medicare taxes set to go into effect in 2013 were      NOT affected by this bill.&nbsp; This      means the additional 3.8% Medicare surtax on net investment income and the      0.9% tax on earned income (over the thresholds) will still be in      place.&nbsp; This means for many people      the tax on long-term capital gains and dividends will actually be 23.8% in      2013.</li>
<li>The American Opportunity Tax Credit for college      expenses is extended 5 years.</li>
<li>The exclusion from income for qualified charitable      distributions from an IRA to a charity is extended through 2013</li>
<li>Makes permanent many other Bush-era tax cuts in      addition to the rate cuts, including but not limited to: $1,000 child tax      credit, increased dependent care credit, above the line deduction for      student loan interest, adoption credit.</li>
</ul>
<p>There are many additional items included in the 157 page bill.&nbsp; If you are feeling particularly motivated in this new year, you can read every page <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/breaking-full-text-of-the-157-page-bill-to-avert-the-fiscal-cliff-2013-1" target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp; If you&rsquo;d prefer to read some well written summaries that go into more detail than what we have provided, here are a few of our favorites:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://kitces.com/blog/archives/463-Financial-Planning-Implications-of-HR8-the-Taxpayer-Relief-Act-of-2012.html" target="_blank">Financial      Planning Implications of HR8 &ndash; the Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012</a>, by      Michael Kitces</li>
<li><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2013/01/01/five-things-everyone-should-know-about-the-fiscal-cliff-tax-deal/" target="_blank">It      Passed: Five Things Everyone Should know about the Fiscal Cliff Tax Deal</a>,      by Robert Woods at Forbes</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/totalreturn/2013/01/02/what-the-new-law-means-for-taxpayers/?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines" target="_blank">What      the New Law Means for Taxpayers,</a> by Laura Saunders at the Wall Street      Journal</li>
<li><a href="http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/News/20137097.htm" target="_blank">Congress      Passes Fiscal Cliff Act</a>, by Paul Bonner and Alistair Nevius at Journal      of Accountancy</li>
<li><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2013/01/02/house-passes-senate-budget-bill-convincingly-we-have-a-tax-deal/" target="_blank">House      Passes Senate Budget Bill Convincingly: We Have a Tax Deal!</a>, by Kelly      Phillips at Forbes</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have any questions related to the bill and how it might impact your tax situation, feel free to contact us at 410-494-6680 or send us a message <a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/contact-us/" target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp; There are many personal financial planning implications so stay tuned for our thoughts later this month.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2013-1-2%20The%20Taxpayer%20Relief%20Act%20of%202012.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p><p><br/></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Maryland Homestead Tax Credit</title><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/12/20/maryland-homestead-tax-credit.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/12/20/maryland-homestead-tax-credit.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2012-12-20T17:01:20Z</published><updated>2012-12-20T17:01:20Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>We&rsquo;ve been asked by quite a few clients lately about the Maryland Homestead Tax Credit and whether they need to do something by the end of the year to keep it.&nbsp; December 31 marks the deadline for filing the Homestead Eligibility Application if you haven&rsquo;t already done so.&nbsp; However, in most cases we find that the application has already been filed.</p>
<p>Just to give a quick refresher, the Homestead Credit was passed to help homeowners deal with large assessment increases on their principal residence.&nbsp; As home values soared in the 2000&rsquo;s, many people faced big increases in their real estate tax bills due to the increased assessment values.&nbsp;&nbsp; The Homestead Credit was put in place to cap the annual increase in assessment value at 10% per year.&nbsp; This helped ease the burden of increased real estate taxes on many individuals.</p>
<p>In 2007, legislation was passed that required homeowners to submit a one-time application in order to continue eligibility for the Homestead Credit.&nbsp; Prior to that the credit was automatically available and as a result many people were taking the credit on their primary home along with vacation and rental homes.&nbsp; Property owners were mailed a notice sometime between 2007 and 2011 to alert them that an application needed to be filed.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Odds are you don&rsquo;t remember if you ever filled out the application.&nbsp; That&rsquo;s ok &ndash; it&rsquo;s easy to find out online!&nbsp; Just go to the State Department <a href="http://sdatcert3.resiusa.org/rp_rewrite/" target="_blank">website</a> and enter your county and street address.&nbsp; Once you find your property, at the very bottom of the screen you should see a section that shows &ldquo;Homestead Application Information&rdquo;.&nbsp; If you&rsquo;ve filed an application you should see the details here, and it will look like this:</p>
<p>&nbsp;<span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/Untitled.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1356023558673" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>What if it doesn&rsquo;t show that you&rsquo;ve applied for the credit?&nbsp; You can easily fill out an application online <a href="https://sdathtc.resiusa.org/homestead" target="_blank">here</a> or you can print out a <a href="http://www.dat.state.md.us/sdatweb/homestead_application.pdf" target="_blank">PDF</a> of the application and mail it or fax it in.&nbsp; More details about the credit and how to file an application can be found <a href="http://www.dat.state.md.us/sdatweb/homestead_app.htm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;Be sure to check for yourself and remind others to check as well.&nbsp; With the recent decline in home values, this credit isn&rsquo;t at the top of most people&rsquo;s minds right now.&nbsp; But if home values rebound or even start to increase again, you want to make sure you have filed your application so that your real estate tax rates don&rsquo;t jump up unexpectedly!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2012-12-19%20Maryland%20Homestead%20Credit.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>New Year's Resolutions</title><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/12/20/new-years-resolutions.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/12/20/new-years-resolutions.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2012-12-20T16:58:29Z</published><updated>2012-12-20T16:58:29Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 175px;" src="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/exercise-money-225x300.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1356023706146" alt="" /></span></span>I see it every January.&nbsp; My gym fills up with people working on their New Year&rsquo;s resolution.&nbsp; It seems like everyone sits down at the end of the year and decides next year will be the one where they lose some weight.&nbsp; And of course losing weight means getting to the gym and eating healthier.&nbsp; I applaud all of these people because I believe living healthy is important to living a happy life.&nbsp; But sometimes I wonder why people don&rsquo;t look at their financial health the same way they look at their physical health?</p>
<p>They are both similar in many ways.&nbsp; Being healthy physically and financially will lead to less stress and a better quality of life.&nbsp; Both take long-term commitment and sacrifice.&nbsp; You can&rsquo;t expect to lose all your weight in a week and you won&rsquo;t solve all your financial issues overnight either.&nbsp; If you want to lose weight you need to eat healthier and stay active.&nbsp; If you want to reach your retirement goals you need to save more, spend less and invest wisely.&nbsp; Just as I always advise you not to jump on the hot new investment; you also shouldn&rsquo;t try every new fad diet that comes along.&nbsp; Sure it might help you lose some weight in the short term, just as you might hit a couple home runs on &ldquo;hot&rdquo; investments.&nbsp; But in the long run you are bound to revert back to your old ways and gain back that weight, just as you will eventually pick some losing investments that will hurt your retirement goals.</p>
<p>The best way to reach your long-term goals is to change your lifestyle, not try for the quick fix every year.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s not easy and it&rsquo;s certainly not the most fun way to reach your goals, but it&rsquo;s the best way.&nbsp; This doesn&rsquo;t mean you can&rsquo;t enjoy yourself from time to time.&nbsp; Just as most diets allow you one &ldquo;cheat&rdquo; day where you can eat something bad, if you are trying to save and cut costs, allow yourself to &ldquo;cheat&rdquo; every once in a while and buy something you really want.&nbsp; It will make that purchase all the more rewarding and enjoyable.&nbsp; Just make sure that purchase isn&rsquo;t so big it will do damage to your long-term goals.</p>
<p>Many people are self-starters who will try to reach their financial and physical fitness goals on their own.&nbsp; However others need a little guidance.&nbsp; These people might hire a personal trainer to help them get in shape.&nbsp; Fee-only financial planners can offer the same benefit to your financial health.&nbsp; Whether you just need to come in for a one time review of your finances to see if you are on the right path, or if you need ongoing advice to make sure you stay on track, we can help.</p>
<p>These next couple weeks are a great time to sit back and come up with your personal goals for 2013.&nbsp; Maybe this year, in addition to getting in better physical shape, you should make a resolution to improve your financial health too!&nbsp; Take the time to sit down and review your portfolio to make sure your asset allocation still makes sense given your risk tolerance and goals.&nbsp; Look at what your expenses were for 2012 and see if there are areas you can cut back.&nbsp; What did you save last year?&nbsp; Can you save more?&nbsp; Even bumping up your 401(k) by just 1% can make a <a href="http://financialducksinarow.com/5857/join-in-the-movement-add-1-to-your-savings-this-year/">huge difference</a>!&nbsp; These are just a few of the things you should be looking at.&nbsp; We&rsquo;re happy to help so <a href="http://lkbenson.com/contact-us/">contact us</a> if you want to schedule a time to talk.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2012-12-18%20New%20Years%20Resolutions.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>No More Unlimited FDIC Insurance</title><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/11/30/no-more-unlimited-fdic-insurance.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/11/30/no-more-unlimited-fdic-insurance.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2012-11-30T19:29:47Z</published><updated>2012-11-30T19:29:47Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Another change is coming to the limits of FDIC insurance for deposit accounts.&nbsp; Back in 2010, President Obama <a href="http://lkbenson.com/chris/2010/8/30/fdic-insurance-increase.html">made permanent</a> an increase in the FDIC insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000.&nbsp; However there was a <a href="http://lkbenson.com/chris/2010/12/15/fdic-insurance-limit-changes.html">provision</a> of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act that also provided for unlimited insurance coverage of non-interest bearing accounts from 2010 through the end of 2012.&nbsp; Beginning January 1, 2013, this coverage is reduced back to $250,000.&nbsp; So if you have over $250,000 in a non-interest bearing account, you might want to consider moving some of that money to another bank or talking to your bank about strategies to reduce your risk.</p>
<p>We understand not many people will be impacted by this change but it also provides a good reminder to review the FDIC Insurance rules.&nbsp; If you have any bank deposits over $250,000 at one institution, you might be exposing yourself to more risk than you realize.&nbsp; If something were to happen to that bank, all the cash you hold there might not be covered by FDIC insurance.&nbsp; We have a <a href="http://lkbenson.com/storage/FDIC%20Summary%20Update.pdf">good article</a> on our <a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/">website</a> summarizing the FDIC Insurance rules or you can go directly to the <a href="http://www.fdic.gov/">FDIC website</a>.&nbsp; If you have any questions feel free to contact us.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2012-11-30 No More Unlimited FDIC Insurance.pdf">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>2012 Election Results</title><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/11/20/2012-election-results.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/11/20/2012-election-results.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2012-11-20T17:47:15Z</published><updated>2012-11-20T17:47:15Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>For $6 billion, I could buy the three most valuable NFL franchises in the country and I&rsquo;d still have enough left over to buy the Baltimore Orioles!&nbsp; That is approximately how much money was spent on this year&rsquo;s election.&nbsp; So what changed as a result of all that spending?&nbsp; Not much!</p>
<p>President Obama won reelection with wins in both the Electoral College as well as the popular vote.&nbsp; The Democrats retained control of the Senate while Republicans held onto the House.&nbsp; So the government will have a very familiar look, but does that mean we will be in for the same old gridlock of the past four years?&nbsp; Maybe, but maybe not.&nbsp;</p>
<p>As we have discussed at length here on this blog and in person with many of you, our government has a lot of issues to deal with and they need to deal with them soon.&nbsp; Before the election there was your typical posturing about what each party would do to avoid the &ldquo;fiscal cliff&rdquo; and to set the country on the right course.&nbsp; Now they need to get down to it and come to some type of agreement.&nbsp; There have already been some good signs that each side is willing to bend a little.&nbsp; The Republicans are reeling after failing to capture the Presidency or to pick up seats in the Senate and now seem more willing to negotiate.&nbsp;</p>
<p>So what will happen next?&nbsp; There are two more likely scenarios.&nbsp; The first is a short-term extension during the lame duck session for many of the tax increases and budget cuts set to go in effect at the beginning of 2013.&nbsp; This would give Congress time to come up with comprehensive tax reform in 2013.&nbsp; The other scenario is they don&rsquo;t come up with any agreement during the lame duck and instead it takes until early 2013 to agree to extensions of the tax increases/spending cuts.&nbsp; This is clearly the riskier scenario and many think the President will fear the reaction of the markets to this scenario and that will help hasten a deal before the end of the year.&nbsp;</p>
<p>No matter what happens it looks like major tax reform could occur sometime in 2013 or 2014.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s too early to tell what exactly this would look like but many experts are already comparing it to the 1986 reform.&nbsp; The impact on the markets is also yet to be seen.</p>
<p>Despite the uncertainty this is not the time to panic with your investments.&nbsp; Trying to time the markets and predict what will happen with our government is nearly impossible.&nbsp; We have already seen a sell off in equities since the election but we don&rsquo;t know when they will recover.&nbsp; Trying to get out of equities now could leave you on the sidelines for any recovery.&nbsp; As always, you should stick to your asset allocation targets and maintain a diversified portfolio that is appropriate for you.&nbsp; If you&rsquo;d like help assessing your portfolio and coming up with a financial plan, feel free to contact us.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2012-11-20 Election Results.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Something Magic Happens</title><category term="&quot;under armour&quot;"/><category term="diversification"/><category term="finances"/><category term="investment"/><category term="orioles"/><category term="ravens"/><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/10/24/something-magic-happens.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/10/24/something-magic-happens.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2012-10-24T14:59:20Z</published><updated>2012-10-24T14:59:20Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>Those who know me know that I&rsquo;m a sports fanatic.&nbsp; I admit it&rsquo;s unhealthy.&nbsp; I wish I could change it, but I know I can&rsquo;t.&nbsp; My mood on Mondays will always depend on how the Ravens did on Sunday.&nbsp; Walking down Eutaw Street at Camden Yards will always bring a smile to my face.&nbsp; And even though March Madness happens during tax season, I always manage to find time to watch my Terps and Bison.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Spending my work days watching the markets and helping people with their finances, I often relate sports to finance.&nbsp; Many lessons can be learned from watching sports and some of these lessons can also be applied to investing.&nbsp; This occurred to me as I watched a magical season unfold for my Baltimore Orioles.&nbsp; In case you missed it, &ldquo;dem O&rsquo;s&rdquo; had gone 14 years without a winning season before this year.&nbsp; To put that in perspective, I was 15 years old the last time we had a winning record.&nbsp; Out of nowhere, with a roster full of guys nobody had heard of, Buck Showalter managed this team to the playoffs where we took the rich and mighty Yankees to a game 5.&nbsp; It was a season full of that old &ldquo;Orioles Magic&rdquo; and probably the best baseball season I have ever witnessed.&nbsp;</p>
<p>So what can we learn from this amazing season that we can apply to investing?&nbsp; Here are some of my takeaways:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Don&rsquo;t be a homer.</strong> - As an Orioles      fan I only root for them and would NEVER root for the Yankees or Red      Sox.&nbsp; Similarly, someone who works      at Under Armour might want to put all their money in company stock and      would NEVER consider investing in Nike.&nbsp;      While I wouldn&rsquo;t advise this person to invest in Nike, I also      wouldn&rsquo;t want them putting everything into company stock.&nbsp; Diversification is critical to      successful investing and the perils of having all your assets in your      company stock have been proven in cases like Enron and Worldcom.&nbsp; In the sports world it&rsquo;s ok to put all      your eggs in one basket, but don&rsquo;t do the same with your investments.</li>
<li><strong>Don&rsquo;t jump on the bandwagon &ndash; </strong>The      Orioles had a great season and everyone is excited to be an O&rsquo;s fan      again.&nbsp; But does one good year mean      they have turned a corner and will have an extended run of success?&nbsp; As a fan I sure hope so, but if they      were an investment, I wouldn&rsquo;t be putting my money with them just      yet.&nbsp; For years they made bad move      after bad move and gave us no reason to believe they were a competent      organization.&nbsp; If a corporation or      mutual fund went through 14 years like that they would probably be out of      business.&nbsp; But if they managed to      survive, and suddenly had one great year, would you want to invest in that      company?&nbsp; Of course not.&nbsp; Wait until they prove the turnaround is      for real.</li>
<li><strong>Stick to well run organizations &ndash;</strong> Unlike the Orioles, the Ravens have proven for years to be a consistent      winner.&nbsp; It all starts at the top      with a great owner who lets his great management team run the      business.&nbsp; If you were investing in a      sports franchise, the Ravens would be the type of organization you want to      invest in.&nbsp; Sure they might have a      bad year here or there, but you know they have a great foundation and do      things the right way.&nbsp; </li>
<li><strong>Have reasonable expectations &ndash; </strong>When      the Orioles recorded the last out in Game 5 this year I was      disappointed.&nbsp; But I wasn&rsquo;t      upset.&nbsp; I came into the year      expecting another losing record and I never thought I&rsquo;d be in Camden Yards      watching them win a postseason game in October.&nbsp; So the season had already been a success      for me.&nbsp; Contrast that with the      Ravens final game last year.&nbsp; You      remember it.&nbsp; The Lee Evans drop and      the Billy Cundiff miss.&nbsp; I was      devastated.&nbsp; After 4 straight years      in the playoffs and our 2<sup>nd</sup> AFC championship I thought for sure      we were finally headed back to the Super Bowl.&nbsp; And then it all fell apart.&nbsp; My high expectations for the Ravens made      their loss way more painful than the Orioles loss.&nbsp; Keep this in mind when you approach the      markets.&nbsp; Don&rsquo;t expect to return 10      or 11% every year.&nbsp; Don&rsquo;t think your      portfolio is going to beat the market by a few points every year.&nbsp; If you do, you&rsquo;ll most likely be      disappointed.&nbsp; Instead shoot for      moderate growth rates and be pleasantly surprised if you beat it.&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<p>Sports can often make us irrational.&nbsp; Just listen to sports talk radio for a few minutes after your home team loses and you are bound to hear a caller prove this point.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s ok to be irrational when it comes to sports.&nbsp; They are there for our entertainment.&nbsp; But don&rsquo;t approach your financial life and your investments the same way you do sports.&nbsp; You need to be rational when it comes to investing.&nbsp; Your investments are there so that one day you can retire and live off your savings.&nbsp; Have a long-term plan and stick to it.&nbsp; In the future you will be happy you did.&nbsp; And if your team does make it to the championship, maybe you&rsquo;ll be able to afford the trip to see it live.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2012-10-17%20Something%20Magic%20Happens.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Mortgage Rates Still Low</title><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/10/24/mortgage-rates-still-low.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/10/24/mortgage-rates-still-low.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2012-10-24T14:45:32Z</published><updated>2012-10-24T14:45:32Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><span>We&rsquo;ve discussed the problems that the current low interest rates are causing for your portfolio, especially if you are living off the income from your investments.&nbsp; But there is one big advantage to the latest round of quantitative easing and the continued efforts to keep interest rates low.&nbsp; If you are a homeowner or are looking to buy your own home, interest rates are also at record low levels, making mortgages more affordable than ever. &nbsp;Even if you&rsquo;ve refinanced recently, it might be worth looking into doing it again.</span></p>
<p>I just went through a refinance myself and was able to get an incredibly low rate that will save us thousands of dollars over the length of our loan.&nbsp; We have seen many clients do the same.&nbsp; Refinancing to a lower rate can free up additional cash flow in the short term and it also lowers the cost of the loan in the long-term.&nbsp; If your cash flow is fine you might even want to consider a shorter loan term.&nbsp; This lowers the cost of the loan even further and allows you to pay down the principal of the loan much quicker.</p>
<p>It is important to run a cost benefit analysis before deciding on a refinance to make sure the settlement costs don&rsquo;t negate any savings from the new lower rate.&nbsp; You will need to factor in your current and potential loan rates along with estimated closing costs on the refinance.&nbsp; You should also consider how long you plan to stay in your current house.&nbsp; If you want to move in the next couple years you might not have enough time to recover the costs of the new loan.</p>
<p>If you are currently paying anywhere over 3.5-4% on your mortgage it would be worthwhile to at least consider a refinance, even if you refinanced not that long ago.&nbsp; We would be happy to help you run the numbers and decide if it makes sense for you.&nbsp; Contact us to find out more.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2012-10-18%20Mortgage%20Rates%20Still%20Low.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry><entry><title>Always Making Trouble (AMT)</title><category term="&quot;alternative minimum tax&quot;"/><category term="AMT"/><category term="patch"/><id>http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/9/26/always-making-trouble-amt.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lkbenson.com/chris/2012/9/26/always-making-trouble-amt.html"/><author><name>Admin</name></author><published>2012-09-26T14:36:33Z</published><updated>2012-09-26T14:36:33Z</updated><content type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>The alternative minimum tax (AMT) has long been a headache for many taxpayers.&nbsp; It has also been an ongoing issue for lawmakers.&nbsp; The AMT was originally intended to keep America&rsquo;s richest taxpayers from employing tax strategies and investing in tax shelters that allowed them to reduce or eliminate their income taxes.&nbsp; Unfortunately these targeted taxpayers are no longer the only ones dealing with the effects of the AMT.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Unlike most other tax thresholds, the AMT was not indexed for inflation when it was enacted back in 1982.&nbsp; In 1986, the median household income in the U.S. was $23,301.&nbsp; In 2011 that number had risen to $49,103.&nbsp; That&rsquo;s an increase of over 110% and it means the thresholds originally put in place for the AMT would be completely irrelevant in today&rsquo;s tax law.&nbsp; Congress obviously understands this and has implemented what they call &ldquo;patches&rdquo; every couple years to the AMT in order to keep up with inflation.</p>
<p>For years we&rsquo;ve heard about the need to reform the AMT and many people insist we need to scrap the whole system and start from scratch.&nbsp; Instead we keep getting these short-term patches from Congress because they can never agree on an appropriate way to &ldquo;fix&rdquo; it.&nbsp; That leads us to 2012.</p>
<p>Again we are stuck in a year where the AMT thresholds are much lower than they should be.&nbsp; It is estimated by the IRS that under current law, 32.9 million people would face the AMT compared to just 4.4 million last year with an average unanticipated tax increase of about $2,800.</p>
<p>So Congress will definitely pass another patch right?&nbsp; Actually both the House and Senate have already passed their own versions of the patch.&nbsp; Not surprisingly, the House bill is tied to an extension of income-tax cuts for taxpayers at all income levels and the Senate bill doesn&rsquo;t extend tax cuts for top earners beyond 2012.&nbsp; So the Republican-led House and the Democrat-led Senate are caught at a crossroads yet again.</p>
<p>Just like so many other issues currently facing our nation, the AMT patch is seemingly being held hostage by our politicians.&nbsp; The impact of not coming to an agreement would be so large, most tax experts simply cannot see a scenario where something doesn&rsquo;t happen before the end of the year.&nbsp; But given recent history, it&rsquo;s probably best to just hope for the best and prepare for the worst.&nbsp;</p>
<p>While we are doing our year end tax-planning we have been looking at the tax consequences under both scenarios.&nbsp; You need to be prepared in case they don&rsquo;t pass a patch and that means understanding what the tax consequences could be.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s always better to be prepared rather than being surprised in April.&nbsp; As always if you&rsquo;d like us to help with your 2012 tax planning, let us know.&nbsp; In the meantime, as always, stay tuned!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lkbenson.com/storage/2012-9-21%20Always%20Making%20Trouble.pdf" target="_blank">PDF Version</a></p>]]></content></entry></feed>